Introductory psychology students (120 females and 120 males) rated attractiveness and fecundity of one of six computer-altered female figures representing three body-weight categories (underweight, normal weight and overweight) and two levels of waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), one in the ideal range (0.72) and one in the non-ideal range (0.86). Both females and males judged underweight figures to be more attractive than normal or overweight figures, regardless of WHR. The female figure with the high WHR (0.86) was judged to be more attractive than the figure with the low WHR (0.72) across all body-weight conditions. Analyses of fecundity ratings revealed an interaction between weight and WHR such that the models did not differ in the normal weight category, but did differ in the underweight (model with WHR of 0.72 was less fecund) and overweight (model with WHR of 0.86 was more fecund) categories. These findings lend stronger support to sociocultural rather than evolutionary hypotheses.
Full citation: Puhl RM, Boland FJ. Predicting female physical attractiveness: Waist-to-hip ratio versus thinness. Psychology, Evolution & Gender. 2001;3(1):27-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616660110049573
RESOURCE TYPE:
FOCUS AREAS:
RUDD AUTHORS:
RUDD CODE:
There is clear documentation of bias and discrimination aimed at overweight persons, but less is known about methods individuals use to cope with weight stigma. This paper provides an analysis of such methods, integrating work on weight stigma with what is known from other relevant areas (e.g., race and gender bias). Multiple means of coping have been studied, ranging from attempts to change the stigmatizing condition (losing weight) to taking pride in the condition and mobilizing social action to prevent discrimination. The most promising areas for future research, methodological challenges, and the importance of individual difference and situational factors as moderating variables are discussed.
Full citation: Puhl R, Brownell KD. Ways of coping with obesity stigma: review and conceptual analysis. Eat Behav. 2003;4(1):53-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-0153(02)00096-x
RESOURCE TYPE:
FOCUS AREAS:
RUDD AUTHORS:
RUDD CODE:
In contrast to other threats to American children’s health, the treatment and prevention of childhood obesity are considered the responsibility of individual children and their parents. This pressure exists in the context of the societal stigmatization of overweight children and the powerful environmental induce-ments aimed directly at children to eat nutritionally poor foods. Parents of overweight children are left in the difficult position of fearing the social and health consequences of their child’s obesity, and fighting a losing battle against the omnipotent presence of the media and constant exposure to unhealthy foods. This paper brings together several literatures to provide a comprehensive examination of the major challenges facing obese children and their families. In particular, this paper documents the extent of stigmatization towards overweight children and reviews evidence of the conflicting advice given to parents about how to help children develop healthful eating in the face of biological and learned food preferences. We conclude with a call for a shift in thinking about the role of our society in the treatment and prevention of childhood obesity.
Full citation: Schwartz MB, Puhl R. Childhood obesity: a societal problem to solve. Obes Rev. 2003;4(1):57-71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-789x.2003.00093.x
RESOURCE TYPE:
FOCUS AREAS:
RUDD AUTHORS:
Rebecca Puhl